Friday,
May 16, 2014
For
some time now the picture of Total Employee Compensation has been changing and
evolving. Few, if any, organizations
maintain the concept of cradle-to-grave paternalism which existed prior to and following
World War II. That evolution is best
described as a shift in the focus point of those roles and responsibilities of
the employer vs. the employee. This
shift is currently best illustrated in the area of retirement as employers have
moved from traditional defined benefit pension plans to defined compensation retirement
plans, e.g., 401(k), 403(b), and similarly styled arrangements. However, emerging are the unmistakable signs
of a change in the roles and responsibilities of employer sponsored health care
benefits. As with the development of
defined compensation retirement plans, the employee has taken on a greater role
in selecting and maintaining their health care benefits. This has and will continue to change the image
of Total Employee Compensation.
Fundamental
to the employer-employee contract is an exchange of value in return for
services provided; value may be in the form of direct cash payments, indirect
payments for benefits, in-kind values such discounted products and services,
and even the value of an organization’s public image. In the end, the employer-employee
relationship is a mutual bond, a co-dependent bond based on a series of reciprocal promises; both parties perceive that such a relationship will benefit each of
them respectively. Total Employee
Compensation is that value offered to employees in return for their initial and
continued services.
The
latest influence on the shape of Total Employee Compensation is the on-going
role out of national health care reform in the form of the Affordable Care Act. The opening statement on a Department of
Health and Human Services web page reads, in part, “The Affordable Care Act
puts consumers back in charge of their health care”. As a “consumer”, employees have for the last
few years begun to move into the environment of Consumer-Directed Health Care Plans. Such plans remove a significant
decision making role from the employer and transfer it to the employee by
requiring the employee-consumer to decide when and how to spend their own
monies in the form of higher out-of-pocket costs. As with the growth of defined compensation
retirement plans after the 1980’s, Consumer-Directed Health Care Plans are
expected to continue their current replacement of more traditional health care
plans.
Total
Employee Compensation is a toolbox employers employ to attract and motivate
their talent. Health care benefits are a
major tool through which organizations appeal to and motivate individual to
join and support the organization’s mission.
Anything which detracts from an organization’s ability to accomplish that
goal may impact the ongoing profitability and viability of an employer. While most large employers are expected to
maintain sponsored health care benefit plans, smaller organizations and those
in highly competitive business sectors may find themselves pressured into
dropping health care or adopting a strictly defined contribution approach to
health care.