Friday,
November 29, 2013
At
one time the standard model for many compensation plans was to annually price
jobs based on internal job evaluations and market data comparison to external
competitors with similar organizations, benchmark jobs, labor forces, revenue
streams, even down to regional variations.
Organizations often employed a merit matrix, designed to allocate
specific salary percentage increases based on a combination of comp-ratio and
performance levels. It was not unusual
for most employees to come to expect an increase simply because they had
clocked one more year of service with the organization. “Just doing one’s job” qualified many
employees for an annual increase, although it was the same level of performance
as the prior year. While many employers
reported they had a “performance based pay” system, many of those systems were performance
based in name only and were neither robust nor valid.
But
“the times they are a-changin’”, organizations have begun to re-think who, when,
how, and. why employees are rewarded. A
trend that has been emerging for some time now is that employers must reward
and recognize the continuous creation of “value” by their workers. Current compensation design has already built into “base” pay, remuneration for an average level, i.e., “meets” level of
performance. Only those employees who
can demonstrate creation of value for the organization should be rewarded.
But
exactly what is “value creation”? Value
creation is whatever makes an organization more competitive, effective,
efficient, and compliant either to its internal or external customers. Value creation includes, designing new
profitable and competitive products and processes, eliminating and reducing cost, waste,
errors or re-work, developing new profitable markets, and customers, avoiding or
limiting litigation, regulatory penalties, … etc. How does an employee create value for an
employer? It starts with engaging and empowering workers to think like owners and entrepreneurs.
Even small changes in a process can yield significant results. Often this change requires “creative destruction” of the existing process or product, which can make many organizational
leaders uncomfortable.
Compensation
plans in the future must reward an organization’s talent who recognize
opportunities and convert those opportunities into desirable outcomes for their
employers, thus adding value. Merely
continuing to “do one’s job”, will only delivery last-year’s results, which
in today’s hyper-competitive world is no longer acceptable. Organizational managers who inhibit innovation, change, and value creation must be re-educated to become coaches, mentors, and enablers of talent. Future
compensation systems must reward those managers who routinely produce a flow of
talented employees for the organization.
While many managers consider themselves to be a control point, reward
and recognition methods must reinforce their talent development and growth-enabling
characteristics.
Finally,
future compensation systems must be designed in a way which meets the
organization’s needs today yet be flexible and robust enough to continue
meeting its ever changing needs as the organization evolves, growths, and
re-invents itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment